When Leaders Don’t Decide, Teams Burn Out

Not All Leadership Burnout Is Caused by Workload. Some of It Is Caused by Leaders Who Avoid Making Decisions

Leadership can be exhausting. Endless emails. Constant firefighting. Back-to-back meetings. I have often felt that I had no time to do any real work because of all those meetings.

But here’s a thought: What if the workload itself isn’t always the root cause of leadership burnout?

What if a significant part of it comes from indecision — leaders delaying choices, waiting for more information, worrying about making the wrong decision?

In this article, we explore why decision-making sits at the heart of effective leadership, how it affects team energy, and how leaders can make better choices — without burning themselves out or burning out their teams.

Why Decision-Making Matters So Much

Leadership is, at its core, a decision-making job.

Research shows that leaders spend roughly 40% of their time making decisions — both big strategic ones and countless smaller operational ones. That is almost half of a leader’s working day spent choosing between options and setting direction.

Organisations with effective decision-making processes outperform their peers by significant margins — up to 33% higher financial performance and 27% better implementation success.

That means good decisions are not abstract ideals. They are measurable value.

Indecision Has Real Costs

Not making a choice is still a choice. And it has consequences.

Every time a leader says:

• “Let’s wait for more data.”

• “We need consensus.”

• “Let’s revisit this later.”

they are effectively choosing uncertainty.

That uncertainty does not just float in the ether — it transfers directly to the team.

Team members begin:

• second-guessing priorities

• deferring action

• operating without clarity

• feeling frustration or mistrust

Ambiguity — even when the intention is to avoid risk — becomes an emotional burden, not only for leaders themselves but above all for their teams.

Is There a Proven Decision-Making Style?

Clearly, no single style fits every situation.

Leadership frameworks such as the Vroom–Yetton model show that effective leaders adapt their decision-making approach to context — sometimes deciding quickly themselves, other times involving the team more deeply.

What matters is not how you decide, but why and when you use a given approach.

A decision delayed in the name of consensus or perfect information is not always wise. Sometimes it simply postpones conflict, diffuses accountability, and leaves teams waiting.

Stress Changes Everything — and Experience Matters Most

Stress adds another dimension to decision-making.

Under pressure, cognitive resources are limited, and even simple decisions can feel disproportionately hard. Research in leadership psychology shows that stress impairs rational thinking — and in those moments, experience becomes a leader’s greatest asset.

This is why seasoned leaders often appear calmer under pressure. Not because they are immune to stress, but because over time they have built a deep internal library of decision-making experiences. Their subconscious recognises patterns and accelerates judgment.

Emotional Intelligence Shapes Decision Quality

Another critical dimension of decision-making is emotional intelligence. Good decisions are not purely analytical — they are emotional as well.

Leaders with strong emotional intelligence are more likely to:

• regulate their own anxiety

• read the emotional state of the team

• anticipate the emotional consequences of their choices

This does not make decisions easier. It makes them better — and more humane.

Does Involving Your Team Dilute Authority?

Many leaders worry that it does — but evidence suggests the opposite.

When teams are involved in decisions that affect them, they tend to be:

• more committed

• more engaged

• more willing to implement decisions without resistance

This is not about consensus at all costs.
It is about shared ownership where it matters.

Practical Principles for Better Leadership Decisions

Here are research-backed principles leaders can adopt:

1. Define the decision context first
Not every decision needs group input. Ask:

• Is this strategic or operational?

• Does it affect culture or just process?

• Who truly needs to be involved?

2. Use structure, not guesswork
Decision matrices, weighted scoring, and risk management frameworks reduce bias and sharpen focus.
Clarifying roles and accountability speeds up decision-making and creates feedback for future decisions:
Who decides? Who implements? Who evaluates?

3. Balance data with judgment
Data matters — but waiting for a perfect dataset is still a delay. Strong leaders decide with enough data, not perfect data.

4. Manage stress and awareness
Your internal state directly affects your decisions. Practices that sharpen focus, reduce reactivity, and preserve energy are not luxuries — they are leadership tools.

Takeaway

If you are feeling leadership fatigue — or noticing it in your team — start by asking yourself:

What decision am I postponing, and who is paying for it?

Burnout is not always about how much we do.
Sometimes it is about how long we wait.

1 Bain & Company. (2013). Decide & deliver: Five steps to break through your organization’s bottlenecks. Harvard Business Review Press.

2 Bain & Company. (2017). The decision-driven organization. Bain & Company.

3 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

4 Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). New approaches to leadership: Cognitive resources and organizational performance. Wiley.

5 Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

6 Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business School Press.

7 Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

8 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

9 McKinsey & Company. (2009). How leaders make better decisions. McKinsey Quarterly.

10 McKinsey & Company. (2010). The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quarterly.

11 Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press.

12 Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17–24.